Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD vs TYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MLPD paid 14.1% of its price in cash against TYLG’s 10.2%, though TYLG returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MLPD and TYLG
Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $26m for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF and $17m for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% of it arrived as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% as cash
14.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Not measured
TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TYLG
+20.4%
10.2% of it arrived as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TYLG
+20.4%
10.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +20.4%. TYLG over 1 year: paid 10.2%, price +9.3%, total +20.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Both charts share one scale, 0 to +20.4%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.60% a year; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; MLPD is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | MLPD | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.4% | +20.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 0.6% | rose 9.3% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $26m | $17m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
May 17, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 128 weekly returnsFrom May 2024 to Oct 2026, TYLG returned more: +59.8% to +34.3%. MLPD swung less: 10.2% to 19.8%. MLPD fell less at its worst: −9.7% to −22.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MLPD | TYLG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +34.3% | +59.8% | TYLG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.7% | +21.0% | TYLG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.5% | +28.6% | TYLG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.2% | 19.8% | MLPD | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 8.0% | 13.2% | MLPD | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −9.7% | −22.1% | MLPD | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.85 | TYLG (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.03 | 1.27 | TYLG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.31 | 0.95 | MLPD | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 128 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MLPD and TYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MLPD | TYLG | MLPD | TYLG | MLPD | TYLG |
| 3 months | +3.6% | −1.2% | 3.1% | 2.3% | not measured | not measured |
| 6 months | +3.4% | +6.1% | 6.0% | 5.3% | not measured | not measured |
| 1 year | +15.4% | +20.4% | 14.1% | 10.2% | not measured | not measured |
| 3 years | – | +82.8% | – | 35.5% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: MLPD May 2024 · TYLG Nov 2022 | +32.7% | +130.4% | 30.2% | 48.5% | not measured | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MLPD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MLPD paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
TYLG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TYLG paid 10.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MLPD against TYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tylg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MLPD against TYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tylg
[MLPD against TYLG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.