Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD vs TECY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MLPD and TECY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MLPD and TECY
Net assets: $26m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF, and $379,708 on Nov 3, 2026 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF.
Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% of it arrived as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% as cash
14.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.11.1 pts behind XLK
TECY since launch: paid 20.8%, price −24.2%, total −4.3%, XLK +6.8%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XLK
+6.8%
TECY
−4.3%
11.1 pts behind XLK
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.1 pts behind XLK
TECY since launch: paid 20.8%, price −24.2%, total −4.3%, XLK +6.8%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XLK
+6.8%
TECY
−4.3%
11.1 pts behind XLK
20.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TECY since launch: paid 20.8%, price −24.2%, total −4.3%, XLK +6.8%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MLPD costs 0.58 points a year less; MLPD is far larger, $26m against $1.2m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MLPD | TECY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.4% | not published |
| Price change | rose 0.6% (1 year) | fell 24.2% (since May 5, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | 95% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Technology sector, measured through XLK |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $26m | $1.2m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
May 15, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 24 weekly returnsFrom May 2026 to Oct 2026, MLPD returned more: +3.3% to −4.4%. MLPD fell less at its worst: −3.3% to −6.7%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MLPD | TECY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +3.3% | −4.4% | MLPD | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −2.7% | −22.8% | MLPD | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −3.3% | −6.7% | MLPD | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 24 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MLPD and TECY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MLPD | TECY | MLPD | TECY | MLPD | TECY |
| 3 months | +3.6% | −5.0% | 3.1% | 10.3% | not measured | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +3.4% | −4.6% | 6.0% | 20.7% | not measured | −8.6 pts |
| 1 year | +15.4% | – | 14.1% | – | not measured | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MLPD May 2024 · TECY May 2026 | +32.7% | −4.3% | 30.2% | 20.8% | not measured | −11.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for TECY.
MLPD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MLPD paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
TECY
Over the period from its first trade on May 5, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, TECY paid 20.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 24.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.3%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +6.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 42.2%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MLPD against TECY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tecy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MLPD against TECY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tecy
[MLPD against TECY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-tecy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.