Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MLPD vs XLCI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MLPD paid 13.3% of its price in cash against XLCI’s 10.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

13.3%MLPD cash paid, 1 year
10.9%XLCI cash paid, 1 year
+12.0%MLPD total return, 1 year
+2.2%XLCI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLCI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MLPD 24.3XLCI 63.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MLPD35.8 pts behind XLE · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLE+47.8%MLPD+12.0%13.3% as cash35.8 pts behind XLETotal return, distributions reinvestedXLE+47.8%MLPD+12.0%35.8 pts behind XLE
XLCI7.9 pts ahead of XLC · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLCTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLC

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MLPD and XLCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MLPDOnly in XLCI
GLOBAL X MLP & ENERGY INFRAS 102.10%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER 99.79%
CASH 1.05%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.38%
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -1.02%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER OCT26 117 CALL -0.17%
2MLPX US 10/16/2026 C74 -2.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MLPD and XLCI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MLPDXLCIMLPDXLCIMLPDXLCI
3 months+4.2%+3.2%3.0%2.9%−16.2 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+4.1%+2.8%5.7%5.5%−5.8 pts+3.4 pts
1 year+12.0%+2.2%13.3%10.9%−35.8 pts+7.9 pts
Since launch+33.5%+7.3%28.2%12.4%−14.7 pts+1.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MLPD and XLCI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Covered call on XLE, paying monthly
XLCI
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLC, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkEnergy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxyCommunication services (XLC)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.0%8.1%
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year13.3%10.9%
Price change, 1 year−2.1%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+12.0%+2.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+47.8%−5.7%
Ahead or behind−35.8 pts+7.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age863 days415 days
Net assets$27m$3m

MLPD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MLPD paid 13.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.0%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XLCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLCI paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.2%. Communication services (XLC) returned −5.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MLPD or XLCI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MLPD paid 13.3% of its starting price in cash and XLCI paid 10.9%, so MLPD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MLPD or XLCI?
With every distribution reinvested, MLPD returned +12.0% and XLCI returned +2.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so MLPD returned more.
Which is cheaper, MLPD or XLCI?
MLPD charges 0.60% a year and XLCI charges 0.35%, so XLCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MLPD against XLCI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MLPD against XLCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mlpd-vs-xlci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources