Data as of .
XLCI vs XLII: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XLII paid 12.8% of its price in cash against XLCI’s 10.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLCI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XLCI and XLII hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | XLCI | XLII |
|---|---|---|
| SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS | 0.38% | 0.43% |
| Only in XLCI | Only in XLII |
|---|---|
| STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER 99.79% | STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT 100.47% |
| STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER OCT26 117 CALL -0.17% | STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT OCT26 174 CALL -0.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLCI | XLII | XLCI | XLII | XLCI | XLII | |
| 3 months | +3.2% | −3.8% | 2.9% | 2.8% | +1.6 pts | +2.1 pts |
| 6 months | +2.8% | +8.1% | 5.5% | 6.9% | +3.4 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 1 year | +2.2% | +11.9% | 10.9% | 12.8% | +7.9 pts | −0.6 pts |
| Since launch | +7.3% | +13.7% | 12.4% | 14.4% | +1.9 pts | +0.5 pts |
| XLCI State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLC, paying monthly | XLII State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLI, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Communication services (XLC) | Industrials (XLI) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.1% | 5.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 10.9% | 12.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.8% | −1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.2% | +11.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −5.7% | +12.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +7.9 pts | −0.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 415 days | 415 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $15m |
XLCI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLCI paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.2%. Communication services (XLC) returned −5.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.1%, paid monthly.
XLII in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLII paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Industrials (XLI) returned +12.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, XLCI or XLII?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLCI paid 10.9% of its starting price in cash and XLII paid 12.8%, so XLII paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLCI or XLII?
- With every distribution reinvested, XLCI returned +2.2% and XLII returned +11.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLII returned more.
- Which is cheaper, XLCI or XLII?
- XLCI charges 0.35% a year and XLII charges 0.35%, so XLCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLCI against XLII, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlci-vs-xlii Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.