Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MRA vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+14.0 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: SBAR ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.41 pts
A year: MRA 1.18%, SBAR 0.77%, per filings dated Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

SBAR costs 0.41 points a year less; SBAR is far larger, $441m against $2.2m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MRA vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMRASBAR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+7.5%
Price changefell 41.6% (since May 27, 2026)fell 4.8% (1 year)
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkMARA (MARA)not published
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.18%0.77%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$2.2m$441m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
17.0%
MRA cash paid, since launch, May 27, 2026
11.8%
SBAR cash paid, 1 year
−29.1%
MRA total return, since launch, May 27, 2026
+7.5%
SBAR total return, 1 year
MRA · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 20.7 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
−29.1%
MARA
−49.8%

20.7 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MARA

−49.8%

MRA

−29.1%

20.7 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

20.7 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MARA

−49.8%

MRA

−29.1%

20.7 pts ahead of MARA

17.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SBAR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
SBAR
+7.5%
none

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly SBAR Simplify Barrier Income ETF · Defined income, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark MARA (MARA) not set
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 68.8% 12.0%
Expense ratio 1.18% 0.77%
Cash paid, 1 year 17.0% (since launch, May 27, 2026) 11.8%
Price change, 1 year −41.6% (since launch, May 27, 2026) −4.8%
Total return, 1 year −29.1% (since launch, May 27, 2026) +7.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year −49.8% (since launch, May 27, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind +20.7 pts (since launch, May 27, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 77%
Age 169 days 1.6 years
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $2.2m $441m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MRA vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMRASBARMRASBARMRASBAR
3 months−14.8%−0.8%9.1%2.9%+7.0 ptsnot measured
6 months–+2.7%–5.8%–not measured
1 year–+7.5%–11.8%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: MRA May 2026 · SBAR Apr 2025−29.1%+19.7%17.0%19.0%+20.6 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

MRA and SBAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MRA

Over the period from its first trade on May 27, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MRA paid 17.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. MARA (MARA) returned −49.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 20.7 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 68.8%, paid monthly.

SBAR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SBAR paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MRA or SBAR?
MRA charges 1.18% a year and SBAR charges 0.77%, so SBAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MRA against SBAR, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mra-vs-sbar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MRA and SBAR both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MRA and SBAR

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MRA −14.8%SBAR −0.8%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MRA −14.8%, SBAR −0.8%: SBAR +14.0 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.