Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

SBAR vs SCA: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+6.3 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: SBAR ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.41 pts
A year: SBAR 0.77%, SCA 1.18%, per filings dated Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

SBAR costs 0.41 points a year less; SBAR is far larger, $441m against $3.8m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SBAR vs SCA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureSBARSCA
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+7.5%not published
Price changefell 4.8% (1 year)fell 13.8% (since May 27, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedSuper Micro (SMCI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.77%1.18%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$441m$3.8m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
11.8%
SBAR cash paid, 1 year
15.9%
SCA cash paid, since launch, May 27, 2026
+7.5%
SBAR total return, 1 year
+1.6%
SCA total return, since launch, May 27, 2026
SBAR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
SBAR
+7.5%
none

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SCA · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 30.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SCA
+1.6%
SMCI
−29.3%

30.9 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SMCI

−29.3%

SCA

+1.6%

30.9 pts ahead of SMCI

Total return, distributions reinvested

30.9 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SMCI

−29.3%

SCA

+1.6%

30.9 pts ahead of SMCI

15.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

SBAR Simplify Barrier Income ETF · Defined income, paying monthly SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF · Autocallable on SMCI, paying monthly
Strategy defined income autocallable
Benchmark not set Super Micro (SMCI)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 12.0% 43.1%
Expense ratio 0.77% 1.18%
Cash paid, 1 year 11.8% 15.9% (since launch, May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −4.8% −13.8% (since launch, May 27, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +7.5% +1.6% (since launch, May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published −29.3% (since launch, May 27, 2026)
Ahead or behind not available +30.9 pts (since launch, May 27, 2026)
Return of capital, latest estimate 77% 29%
Age 1.6 years 169 days
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $441m $3.8m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: SBAR vs SCA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowSBARSCASBARSCASBARSCA
3 months−0.8%−7.1%2.9%6.3%not measured+24.0 pts
6 months+2.7%–5.8%–not measured–
1 year+7.5%–11.8%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: SBAR Apr 2025 · SCA May 2026+19.7%+1.6%19.0%15.9%not measured+30.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

SBAR and SCA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SBAR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SBAR paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SCA

Over the period from its first trade on May 27, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, SCA paid 15.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −29.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 30.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 43.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 29% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, SBAR or SCA?
SBAR charges 0.77% a year and SCA charges 1.18%, so SBAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SBAR against SCA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sbar-vs-sca

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

SBAR and SCA both write options for income.

Growth of 100

SBAR and SCA

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

SBAR −0.8%SCA −7.1%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

SBAR −0.8%, SCA −7.1%: SBAR +6.3 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.