Data as of .
BCCC vs XBCI: which paid, and which earned it?
BCCC and XBCI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and XBCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in XBCI |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 46.10% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | CBTX US 10/16/26 C1390 36.52% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 19.12% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | CBTX US 10/16/26 P1390 -0.29% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | CBTX US 10/16/26 C2060 -0.54% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | CBTX US 10/16/26 C1980 -0.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | XBCI | BCCC | XBCI | BCCC | XBCI | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +32.2% | 7.7% | 10.1% | −10.0 pts | +3.0 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +14.7% | 14.4% | 18.0% | −6.6 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | not published | 24.2% | not published | +5.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −15.4% | +3.7% | 35.2% | 21.3% | +7.4 pts | −2.5 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 38.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 21.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −20.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | +3.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +6.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −2.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 95% |
| Age | 471 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $179m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XBCI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XBCI paid 21.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or XBCI?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and XBCI charges 0.98%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against XBCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-xbci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.