Data as of .
XBCI vs XBTY: which paid, and which earned it?
XBCI and XBTY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XBCI and XBTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XBCI | Only in XBTY |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 46.10% | Treasury Bill 62.54% |
| CBTX US 10/16/26 C1390 36.52% | Treasury Bill 37.46% |
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 19.12% | |
| CBTX US 10/16/26 P1390 -0.29% | |
| CBTX US 10/16/26 C2060 -0.54% | |
| CBTX US 10/16/26 C1980 -0.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XBCI | XBTY | XBCI | XBTY | XBCI | XBTY | |
| 3 months | +32.2% | +6.9% | 10.1% | 8.4% | +3.0 pts | −22.3 pts |
| 6 months | +14.7% | −1.3% | 18.0% | 23.0% | −1.0 pts | −17.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −42.9% | not published | 37.4% | not published | −11.8 pts |
| Since launch | +3.7% | −34.0% | 21.3% | 60.0% | −2.5 pts | −11.1 pts |
| XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF Synthetic covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | GraniteShares |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 38.0% | 29.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.15% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 21.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −20.3% | −74.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | −42.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +6.3% | −31.1% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.5 pts | −11.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 95% | 92% |
| Age | 227 days | 493 days |
| Net assets | $179m | $10m |
XBCI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XBCI paid 21.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XBTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XBTY paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 74.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −42.9%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.8%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, XBCI or XBTY?
- XBCI charges 0.98% a year and XBTY charges 1.15%, so XBCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XBCI against XBTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-xbty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.