Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
XBCI vs XBTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
XBCI and XBTY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about XBCI and XBTY
Net assets: $238m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF, and $8.8m on Nov 3, 2026 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF.
About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
26.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.4.8 pts behind Bitcoin
XBTY over 1 year: paid 40.3%, price −62.5%, total −25.3%, Bitcoin −20.5%, −4.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Bitcoin
−20.5%
XBTY
−25.3%
4.8 pts behind Bitcoin
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.8 pts behind Bitcoin
XBTY over 1 year: paid 40.3%, price −62.5%, total −25.3%, Bitcoin −20.5%, −4.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Bitcoin
−20.5%
XBTY
−25.3%
4.8 pts behind Bitcoin
40.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XBTY over 1 year: paid 40.3%, price −62.5%, total −25.3%, Bitcoin −20.5%, −4.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
XBCI costs 0.20 points a year less; XBCI is far larger, $238m against $9.2m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | XBCI | XBTY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −25.3% |
| Price change | fell 27.6% (since Feb 3, 2026) | fell 62.5% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 97% of the Oct 9, 2026 payment | 93% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF, measured through BTCI | Bitcoin (BTC-USD) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $238m | $9.2m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, XBCI and XBTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | XBCI | XBTY | XBCI | XBTY | XBCI | XBTY |
| 3 months | +24.3% | +7.0% | 11.7% | 7.6% | +6.8 pts | −16.5 pts |
| 6 months | −9.9% | −4.7% | 14.6% | 16.0% | −5.5 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 1 year | – | −25.3% | – | 40.3% | – | −4.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: XBCI Feb 2026 · XBTY May 2025 | +0.5% | −33.6% | 26.3% | 60.8% | −0.4 pts | −9.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
XBCI
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XBCI paid 26.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XBTY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XBTY paid 40.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 62.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.3%. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) returned −20.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.7%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, XBCI against XBTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-xbty
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). XBCI against XBTY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-xbty
[XBCI against XBTY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-xbty)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.