Data as of .
BCCC vs CEPI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year CEPI paid 35.3% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 24.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: CEPI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and CEPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in CEPI |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.59% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | Micron Technology Inc 5.71% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | Applied Digital Corp 5.64% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | Strategy Inc 5.58% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | MARA Holdings Inc 5.57% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | IREN Ltd 5.29% |
| TSMC 4.72% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | CEPI | BCCC | CEPI | BCCC | CEPI | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +0.9% | 7.7% | 9.6% | −10.0 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +29.4% | 14.4% | 22.2% | −6.6 pts | −4.4 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | +18.1% | 24.2% | 35.3% | +5.9 pts | +6.0 pts |
| Since launch | −15.4% | +26.2% | 35.2% | 51.2% | +7.4 pts | −1.0 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on BITQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | REX |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 41.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 35.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −22.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | +18.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +12.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | +6.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 471 days | 653 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $121m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
CEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CEPI paid 35.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 22.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 41.0%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BCCC or CEPI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and CEPI paid 35.3%, so CEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or CEPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and CEPI returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so CEPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or CEPI?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and CEPI charges 0.85%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against CEPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-cepi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.