Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

BCCC vs BPI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BCCC and BPI both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BCCC and BPI

Net assets: $9.6m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF, and $2.9m on Jun 30, 2026 for Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF.

At a glance

Pair scorecard

BPI costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BCCC vs BPI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureBCCCBPI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year−15.5%not published
Price change, 1 yearfell 41.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkBitcoin (BTC-USD)Bitcoin (BTC-USD)
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 5.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.65%
Net assets, BCCC as of Oct 12, 2026 and BPI as of Jun 30, 2026$9.6m$2.9m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and BPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BCCC BPI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BCCC
VanEck Bitcoin 8.38%
Only in BPI
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF · Covered call on Bitcoin, paying weekly BPI Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF · Covered call on Bitcoin, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Bitcoin (BTC-USD) Bitcoin (BTC-USD)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 30.7% 8.8%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year 25.1% not available
Price change, 1 year −41.0% not available
Total return, 1 year −15.5% not available
Benchmark return, 1 year −20.5% not available
Ahead or behind +5.0 pts not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% not published
Age 1.4 years not stated
Net assets, BCCC as of Oct 12, 2026 and BPI as of Jun 30, 2026 $9.6m $2.9m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: BCCC vs BPI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowBCCCBPIBCCCBPIBCCCBPI
3 months+14.7%+22.4%8.1%5.1%−8.8 pts−1.1 pts
6 months−2.0%−0.5%12.8%7.5%−0.2 pts+1.2 pts
1 year−15.5%–25.1%–+5.0 pts–
Since launch−15.0%–37.3%–+8.8 pts–

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BCCC

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCCC paid 25.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −15.5%. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) returned −20.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.7%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

BPI

At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BCCC or BPI?
BCCC charges 0.75% a year and BPI charges 0.65%, so BPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BCCC against BPI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-bpi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.