Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BPI vs EHY: which paid, and which earned it?

BPI and EHY both write options for income.

Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF.

5.4%BPI cash paid, 1 year
20.5%EHY cash paid, 1 year
+5.4%BPI total return, 1 year
−44.5%EHY total return, 1 year
BPI0.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBIT
EHY5.3 pts behind ETHA · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
ETHA−39.3%EHY−44.5%5.3 pts behind ETHATotal return, distributions reinvestedETHA−39.3%EHY−44.5%5.3 pts behind ETHA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BPI and EHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BPIOnly in EHY
TREASURY BILL 100.00%Cash & Other 56.28%
ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 C 29.96%
United States Treasury Bill 11/27/2026 17.81%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 2.89%
United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 1.05%
ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 P -3.43%
ETHA 09/22/2026 19.44 C -4.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BPI and EHY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BPIEHYBPIEHYBPIEHY
3 months+26.6%+30.3%4.0%12.8%−2.5 pts−24.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+1.3%not published20.9%not published−22.4 pts
Since launch+5.4%−44.5%5.4%20.5%−0.8 pts−5.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BPI and EHY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BPI
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
EHY
Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF
Covered call on ETHA, paying monthly
IssuerGrayscaleAmplify
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Ether (ETHA)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.3%48.4%
Expense ratio0.65%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)20.5% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−0.8%−63.8%
Total return, 1 year+5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)−44.5% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+6.2%−39.3%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−5.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age141 days344 days
Net assets$2m$5m

BPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 30, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BPI paid 5.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

EHY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 9, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, EHY paid 20.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 63.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −44.5%. Ether (ETHA) returned −39.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 48.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BPI or EHY?
BPI charges 0.65% a year and EHY charges 0.75%, so BPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BPI against EHY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BPI against EHY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bpi-vs-ehy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources