Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BCCC vs LFGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LFGY paid 36.9% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 25.1%, though BCCC returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BCCC and LFGY
Net assets: $9.6m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF, and $64m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF.
5 pts ahead of Bitcoin
BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Bitcoin
−20.5%
BCCC
−15.5%
5 pts ahead of Bitcoin
Total return, distributions reinvested
5 pts ahead of Bitcoin
BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Bitcoin
−20.5%
BCCC
−15.5%
5 pts ahead of Bitcoin
25.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.38.2 pts behind SPY
LFGY over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −55.6%, total −23.4%, SPY +14.8%, −38.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
LFGY
−23.4%
38.2 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
38.2 pts behind SPY
LFGY over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −55.6%, total −23.4%, SPY +14.8%, −38.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
LFGY
−23.4%
38.2 pts behind SPY
36.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LFGY over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −55.6%, total −23.4%, SPY +14.8%, −38.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
BCCC costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; LFGY is 9.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BCCC | LFGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −15.5% | −23.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 41.0% | fell 55.6% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment | 46% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (BTC-USD) | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 5.0 pts | behind by 38.2 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.02% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $9.6m | $95m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and LFGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BCCC | LFGY | BCCC | LFGY | BCCC | LFGY |
| 3 months | +14.7% | −13.8% | 8.1% | 10.1% | −8.8 pts | −13.7 pts |
| 6 months | −2.0% | −22.5% | 12.8% | 19.8% | −0.2 pts | −27.6 pts |
| 1 year | −15.5% | −23.4% | 25.1% | 36.9% | +5.0 pts | −38.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: BCCC Jun 2025 · LFGY Jan 2025 | −15.0% | −14.3% | 37.3% | 64.3% | +8.8 pts | −48.6 pts |
BCCC
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCCC paid 25.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −15.5%. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) returned −20.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.7%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
LFGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LFGY paid 36.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 55.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −23.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 38.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 46% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BCCC against LFGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-lfgy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BCCC against LFGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-lfgy
[BCCC against LFGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-lfgy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.