Data as of .
BCCC vs LFGY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year LFGY paid 40.1% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 24.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and LFGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in LFGY |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | Opera Ltd 5.99% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | NVIDIA Corp 5.67% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | Block Inc 5.54% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | Strategy Inc 5.26% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | Core Scientific Inc 5.24% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | Hut 8 Corp 5.24% |
| Galaxy Digital Inc 4.86% | |
| Cipher Digital Inc 4.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | LFGY | BCCC | LFGY | BCCC | LFGY | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | −0.3% | 7.7% | 10.6% | −10.0 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +25.6% | 14.4% | 26.4% | −6.6 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | −1.5% | 24.2% | 40.1% | +5.9 pts | −13.6 pts |
| Since launch | −15.4% | +9.5% | 35.2% | 62.4% | +7.4 pts | −42.8 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | LFGY YieldMax(R) Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on BITQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 39.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.02% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 40.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −44.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −1.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +12.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −13.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 63% |
| Age | 471 days | 612 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $110m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
LFGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LFGY paid 40.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 63% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BCCC or LFGY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and LFGY paid 40.1%, so LFGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or LFGY?
- With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and LFGY returned −1.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LFGY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or LFGY?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and LFGY charges 1.02%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against LFGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-lfgy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.