Data as of .
BCCC vs DFII: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year BCCC paid 24.2% of its price in cash against DFII’s 11.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and DFII hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in DFII |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | 2026-09-30 S&P 500® Mini Index P 2,997.64 1283.75% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | US Dollar 0.98% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | 2026-09-30 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF C 49.94 0.46% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | 2026-09-30 S&P 500® Mini Index C 2,810.29 0.01% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | 2026-09-30 S&P 500® Mini Index C 2,997.64 -0.01% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | 2026-09-25 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF C 46.02 -0.36% |
| 2026-09-30 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF P 49.94 -8.84% | |
| 2026-09-30 S&P 500® Mini Index P 2,810.29 -1175.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | DFII | BCCC | DFII | BCCC | DFII | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +23.6% | 7.7% | 4.7% | −10.0 pts | −5.6 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +10.5% | 14.4% | 8.4% | −6.6 pts | −5.2 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | −32.5% | 24.2% | 11.5% | +5.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | −15.4% | −5.6% | 35.2% | 24.3% | +7.4 pts | −4.4 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 17.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 11.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −43.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −32.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −31.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 471 days | 533 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $21m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
DFII in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DFII paid 11.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 43.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −32.5%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BCCC or DFII?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and DFII paid 11.5%, so BCCC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or DFII?
- With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and DFII returned −32.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BCCC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or DFII?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and DFII charges 0.85%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against DFII, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-dfii Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.