Data as of .
BCCC vs BTCI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year BCCC paid 24.2% of its price in cash against BTCI’s 18.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and BTCI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BCCC | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF | 10.15% | 2.01% |
| Only in BCCC | Only in BTCI |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 58.93% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | CBTX US 10/16/26 C1390 22.94% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 17.31% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | CBTX US 10/16/26 P1390 -0.18% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | CBTX US 10/16/26 C2060 -0.37% |
| CBTX US 10/16/26 C1980 -0.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | BTCI | BCCC | BTCI | BCCC | BTCI | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +22.3% | 7.7% | 7.0% | −10.0 pts | −6.9 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +11.9% | 14.4% | 12.7% | −6.6 pts | −3.8 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | −29.1% | 24.2% | 18.6% | +5.9 pts | +2.0 pts |
| Since launch | −15.4% | +15.5% | 35.2% | 54.4% | +7.4 pts | −5.5 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 26.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 18.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −47.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −29.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −31.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | +2.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 94% |
| Age | 471 days | 701 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $1.3bn |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
BTCI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BCCC or BTCI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and BTCI paid 18.6%, so BCCC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or BTCI?
- With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and BTCI returned −29.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BCCC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or BTCI?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and BTCI charges 0.99%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against BTCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-btci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.