Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BCCC vs YBIT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year YBIT paid 31.3% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 24.2%, though BCCC returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF and YieldMax(R) Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF.

24.2%BCCC cash paid, 1 year
31.3%YBIT cash paid, 1 year
−25.1%BCCC total return, 1 year
−28.7%YBIT total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BCCC 50.9YBIT 44.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BCCC5.9 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBIT
YBIT2.3 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%YBIT−28.7%2.3 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%YBIT−28.7%2.3 pts ahead of IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and YBIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BCCCOnly in YBIT
CASH 60.21%TREASURY BILL 36.73%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49%TREASURY BILL 32.22%
VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15%TREASURY BILL 31.05%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19%
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60%
4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BCCC and YBIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BCCCYBITBCCCYBITBCCCYBIT
3 months+19.2%+23.6%7.7%13.3%−10.0 pts−5.7 pts
6 months+9.2%+10.8%14.4%23.1%−6.6 pts−4.9 pts
1 year−25.1%−28.7%24.2%31.3%+5.9 pts+2.3 pts
Since launch−15.4%−10.5%35.2%74.2%+7.4 pts−31.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BCCC and YBIT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
YBIT
YieldMax(R) Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized29.1%68.0%
Expense ratio0.75%1.02%
Cash paid, 1 year24.2%31.3%
Price change, 1 year−48.5%−58.9%
Total return, 1 year−25.1%−28.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%−31.1%
Ahead or behind+5.9 pts+2.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%0%
Age471 days878 days
Net assets$9m$61m

BCCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YBIT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YBIT paid 31.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 58.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −28.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 68.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BCCC or YBIT?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and YBIT paid 31.3%, so YBIT paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or YBIT?
With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and YBIT returned −28.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BCCC returned more.
Which is cheaper, BCCC or YBIT?
BCCC charges 0.75% a year and YBIT charges 1.02%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BCCC against YBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against YBIT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-ybit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources