Data as of .
BCCC vs ETTY: which paid, and which earned it?
BCCC and ETTY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and ETTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in ETTY |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | United States Treasury Bill 11/17/2026 29.86% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | Cash & Other 28.18% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 24.15% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 C 22.76% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 1.11% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 P -2.60% |
| ETHA 09/22/2026 19.44 C -3.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | ETTY | BCCC | ETTY | BCCC | ETTY | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +36.7% | 7.7% | 9.6% | −10.0 pts | −18.0 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +7.2% | 14.4% | 15.6% | −6.6 pts | −16.6 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | not published | 24.2% | not published | +5.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −15.4% | −42.6% | 35.2% | 15.1% | +7.4 pts | −3.3 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF Option income on ETHA, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 34.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 15.1% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −57.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −42.6% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −39.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 471 days | 344 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $3m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
ETTY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 9, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, ETTY paid 15.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 57.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −42.6%. Ether (ETHA) returned −39.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or ETTY?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and ETTY charges 0.75%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against ETTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-etty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.