Data as of .
BCCC vs EHCC: which paid, and which earned it?
BCCC and EHCC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and EHCC hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BCCC | EHCC |
|---|---|---|
| CASH | 60.21% | 52.60% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES | -0.60% | -0.60% |
| Only in BCCC | Only in EHCC |
|---|---|
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | 2ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 48.12% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | 4ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 1.77% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | 2ETHA 10/30/2026 P10 -0.15% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C20.32 -0.68% |
| 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C18.84 -1.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | EHCC | BCCC | EHCC | BCCC | EHCC | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +32.8% | 7.7% | 8.8% | −10.0 pts | −21.9 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | not published | 14.4% | not published | −6.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −25.1% | not published | 24.2% | not published | +5.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −15.4% | +12.2% | 35.2% | 13.6% | +7.4 pts | −15.2 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | EHCC Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 33.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 13.6% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −3.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | +12.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +27.4% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −15.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 471 days | 169 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $1m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
EHCC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, EHCC paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.2%. Ether (ETHA) returned +27.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.6%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or EHCC?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and EHCC charges 0.75%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against EHCC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-ehcc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.