Data as of .
BITY vs EHCC: which paid, and which earned it?
BITY and EHCC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BITY and EHCC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BITY | Only in EHCC |
|---|---|
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 38.47% | CASH 52.60% |
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 25.12% | 2ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 48.12% |
| Cash & Other 16.45% | 4ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 1.77% |
| MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 C 12.94% | 2ETHA 10/30/2026 P10 -0.15% |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 10.90% | OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% |
| United States Treasury Bill 09/29/2026 0.44% | 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C20.32 -0.68% |
| MBTX 09/22/2026 188.42 C -1.93% | 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C18.84 -1.06% |
| MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 P -2.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BITY | EHCC | BITY | EHCC | BITY | EHCC | |
| 3 months | +15.7% | +32.8% | 6.0% | 8.8% | −13.5 pts | −21.9 pts |
| 6 months | +2.6% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −13.1 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −37.8% | not published | 15.1% | not published | −6.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −20.9% | +12.2% | 26.9% | 13.6% | −5.8 pts | −15.2 pts |
| BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | EHCC Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | Global X |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 23.8% | 33.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 15.1% | 13.6% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −51.5% | −3.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −37.8% | +12.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +27.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.7 pts | −15.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 507 days | 169 days |
| Net assets | $14m | $1m |
BITY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BITY paid 15.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 51.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −37.8%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.8%, paid monthly.
EHCC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, EHCC paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.2%. Ether (ETHA) returned +27.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.6%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BITY or EHCC?
- BITY charges 0.65% a year and EHCC charges 0.75%, so BITY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITY against EHCC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bity-vs-ehcc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.