Data as of .
EHCC vs XBTY: which paid, and which earned it?
EHCC and XBTY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EHCC and XBTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EHCC | Only in XBTY |
|---|---|
| CASH 52.60% | Treasury Bill 62.54% |
| 2ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 48.12% | Treasury Bill 37.46% |
| 4ETHA 10/30/2026 C10 1.77% | |
| 2ETHA 10/30/2026 P10 -0.15% | |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | |
| 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C20.32 -0.68% | |
| 4ETHA 09/25/2026 C18.84 -1.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHCC | XBTY | EHCC | XBTY | EHCC | XBTY | |
| 3 months | +32.8% | +6.9% | 8.8% | 8.4% | −21.9 pts | −22.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −1.3% | not published | 23.0% | not published | −17.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −42.9% | not published | 37.4% | not published | −11.8 pts |
| Since launch | +12.2% | −34.0% | 13.6% | 60.0% | −15.2 pts | −11.1 pts |
| EHCC Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly | XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF Synthetic covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | GraniteShares |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Ether (ETHA) | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 33.6% | 29.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.15% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.6% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.4% | −74.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) | −42.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.4% | −31.1% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.2 pts | −11.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 92% |
| Age | 169 days | 493 days |
| Net assets | $1m | $10m |
EHCC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, EHCC paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.2%. Ether (ETHA) returned +27.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.6%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XBTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XBTY paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 74.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −42.9%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.8%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, EHCC or XBTY?
- EHCC charges 0.75% a year and XBTY charges 1.15%, so EHCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EHCC against XBTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehcc-vs-xbty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.