Which paid more, BCCC or EHY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCCC paid 25.1% of its starting price in cash and EHY paid 30.4%, so EHY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or EHY?

With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −15.5% and EHY −36.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, BCCC or EHY?

BCCC and EHY both charge 0.75% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

BCCC vs EHY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EHY paid 30.4% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 25.1%, though BCCC returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BCCC and EHY

Net assets: $9.6m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF, and $4.8m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF.

BCCC on its own →EHY on its own →

At a glance

25.1%

BCCC cash paid, 1 year

30.4%

EHY cash paid, 1 year

−15.5%

BCCC total return, 1 year

−36.9%

EHY total return, 1 year

BCCC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5 pts ahead of Bitcoin

BCCC

−15.5%

Bitcoin

−20.5%

5 pts ahead of Bitcoin

BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Bitcoin

−20.5%

BCCC

−15.5%

5 pts ahead of Bitcoin

Total return, distributions reinvested

5 pts ahead of Bitcoin

BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Bitcoin

−20.5%

BCCC

−15.5%

5 pts ahead of Bitcoin

25.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. BCCC over 1 year: paid 25.1%, price −41.0%, total −15.5%, Bitcoin −20.5%, +5.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

EHY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 12.2 pts behind Ether

EHY

−36.9%

Ether

−24.7%

12.2 pts behind Ether

EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Ether

−24.7%

EHY

−36.9%

12.2 pts behind Ether

Total return, distributions reinvested

12.2 pts behind Ether

EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Ether

−24.7%

EHY

−36.9%

12.2 pts behind Ether

30.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.75% a year; their one-year returns differ by 21.4 points; BCCC is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BCCC vs EHY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	BCCC	EHY
Paid and earned
Measure	BCCC	EHY
Total return, 1 year	−15.5%	−36.9%
Price change, 1 year	fell 41.0%	fell 62.2%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	100% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment	99% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	BCCC	EHY
Benchmark	Bitcoin (BTC-USD)	Ether (ETH-USD)
Against its benchmark, same days	ahead by 5.0 pts	behind by 12.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	BCCC	EHY
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.75%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$9.6m	$4.7m
Holdings
Measure	BCCC	EHY
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · BCCC scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score9.9BCCC3.9EHY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

BCCC 9.9

EHY 3.9

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Oct 17, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 54 weekly returns

BCCC EHY

Return

Total return edge BCCC −18.8% −50.0%

Annualized edge BCCC −18.2% −48.7%

Price return edge BCCC −44.3% −70.0%

Risk

Volatility edge BCCC 33.8% 50.0%

Max drawdown edge BCCC −35.3% −57.7%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge BCCC −0.53 −1.14

Sortino edge BCCC −0.63 −1.34

Calmar edge BCCC −0.52 −0.84

Reading

From Oct 2025 to Oct 2026, BCCC returned more: −18.8% to −50.0%. BCCC swung less: 33.8% to 50.0%. BCCC fell less at its worst: −35.3% to −57.7%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: BCCC vs EHY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	BCCC	EHY	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−18.8%	−50.0%	BCCC	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	−18.2%	−48.7%	BCCC	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	−44.3%	−70.0%	BCCC	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	33.8%	50.0%	BCCC	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	28.3%	42.6%	BCCC	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−35.3%	−57.7%	BCCC	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	−0.53	−1.14	BCCC	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	−0.63	−1.34	BCCC	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	−0.52	−0.84	BCCC	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 54 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and EHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BCCC EHY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in BCCC

VanEck Bitcoin 8.38%

Only in EHY

Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031 21.20%

ETHA1 12/18/2026 15.75 C 18.57%

ETHA 12/18/2026 48.5 C 3.24%

ETHA 12/18/2026 48.5 P -0.61%

ETHA1 12/18/2026 15.75 P -2.58%

ETHA 11/10/2026 54.63 C -3.86%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF · Covered call on Bitcoin, paying weekly EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF · Covered call on Ether, paying monthly

Issuer Global X Amplify

Strategy covered call covered call

Benchmark Bitcoin (BTC-USD) Ether (ETH-USD)

Pays weekly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 30.7% 50.3%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.75%

Cash paid, 1 year 25.1% 30.4%

Price change, 1 year −41.0% −62.2%

Total return, 1 year −15.5% −36.9%

Benchmark return, 1 year −20.5% −24.7%

Ahead or behind +5.0 pts −12.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 99%

Age 1.4 years 1.1 years

Net assets, BCCC as of Oct 12, 2026 and EHY as of Nov 3, 2026 $9.6m $4.8m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: BCCC vs EHY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	BCCC	EHY	BCCC	EHY	BCCC	EHY
3 months	+14.7%	+1.9%	8.1%	12.9%	−8.8 pts	−24.4 pts
6 months	−2.0%	−23.1%	12.8%	17.6%	−0.2 pts	−26.1 pts
1 year	−15.5%	−36.9%	25.1%	30.4%	+5.0 pts	−12.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: BCCC Jun 2025 · EHY Oct 2025	−15.0%	−52.0%	37.3%	23.2%	+8.8 pts	−7.7 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

BCCC

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCCC paid 25.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −15.5%. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) returned −20.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.7%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

EHY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EHY paid 30.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 62.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −36.9%. Ether (ETH-USD) returned −24.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.3%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BCCC or EHY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCCC paid 25.1% of its starting price in cash and EHY paid 30.4%, so EHY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or EHY?: With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −15.5% and EHY −36.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, BCCC or EHY?: BCCC and EHY both charge 0.75% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCCC vs EHCC BCCC vs YETH BCCC vs NEHI BCCC vs ETCO EHY vs BTCI EHY vs XBTY EHY vs BITY EHY vs BTCC

Where to next

BCCC on its own →EHY on its own →BCCC dividend history →BCCC holdings →EHY dividend history →EHY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

BCCC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

BCCC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

BCCC 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for BCCC ↗

EHY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

EHY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

EHY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Amplify page for EHY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BCCC against EHY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-ehy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.