Data as of .
BCCC vs SOLM: which paid, and which earned it?
BCCC and SOLM both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and SOLM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in SOLM |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | BSOL 11/20/2026 11.05 C 32.59% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | Bitwise Solana Staking ETF 25.45% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 12.43% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 11.88% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | United States Treasury Bill 12/01/2026 9.94% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | Cash & Other 7.89% |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 7.45% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/27/2026 2.49% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | SOLM | BCCC | SOLM | BCCC | SOLM | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | +45.1% | 7.7% | 9.5% | −10.0 pts | +47.3 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | +4.8% | 14.4% | 14.6% | −6.6 pts | −29.0 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | not published | 24.2% | not published | +5.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −15.4% | −38.4% | 35.2% | 16.6% | +7.4 pts | −37.7 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF Option income on BITQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 31.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 16.6% (since launch on Nov 4, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −54.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −38.4% (since launch on Nov 4, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −0.7% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −37.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 471 days | 318 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $2m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
SOLM in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 4, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SOLM paid 16.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −38.4%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 37.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BCCC or SOLM?
- BCCC charges 0.75% a year and SOLM charges 0.75%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against SOLM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-solm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.