Data as of .
BTCC vs SOLM: which paid, and which earned it?
BTCC and SOLM both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BTCC and SOLM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BTCC | Only in SOLM |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 100.00% | BSOL 11/20/2026 11.05 C 32.59% |
| Bitwise Solana Staking ETF 25.45% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 12.43% | |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 11.88% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/01/2026 9.94% | |
| Cash & Other 7.89% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 7.45% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/27/2026 2.49% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTCC | SOLM | BTCC | SOLM | BTCC | SOLM | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | +45.1% | 10.4% | 9.5% | −16.4 pts | +47.3 pts |
| 6 months | +4.3% | +4.8% | 20.2% | 14.6% | −11.4 pts | −29.0 pts |
| 1 year | −32.5% | not published | 29.0% | not published | −1.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −17.7% | −38.4% | 53.5% | 16.6% | −10.8 pts | −37.7 pts |
| BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly | SOLM Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF Option income on BITQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Grayscale | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.2% | 31.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 29.0% | 16.6% (since launch on Nov 4, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −59.1% | −54.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −32.5% | −38.4% (since launch on Nov 4, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −0.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.4 pts | −37.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 534 days | 318 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $2m |
BTCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCC paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 59.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −32.5%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid monthly.
SOLM in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 4, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SOLM paid 16.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −38.4%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 37.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BTCC or SOLM?
- BTCC charges 0.65% a year and SOLM charges 0.75%, so BTCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTCC against SOLM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/btcc-vs-solm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.