Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTCC vs LFGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year LFGY paid 40.1% of its price in cash against BTCC’s 29.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF and YieldMax(R) Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF.

29.0%BTCC cash paid, 1 year
40.1%LFGY cash paid, 1 year
−32.5%BTCC total return, 1 year
−1.5%LFGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BTCC scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BTCC 29.8LFGY 9.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTCC1.4 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BTCC−32.5%1.4 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BTCC−32.5%1.4 pts behind IBIT
LFGY13.6 pts behind BITQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BITQ+12.1%LFGY−1.5%13.6 pts behind BITQTotal return, distributions reinvestedBITQ+12.1%LFGY−1.5%13.6 pts behind BITQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BTCC and LFGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BTCCOnly in LFGY
TREASURY BILL 100.00%Opera Ltd 5.99%
NVIDIA Corp 5.67%
Block Inc 5.54%
Strategy Inc 5.26%
Core Scientific Inc 5.24%
Hut 8 Corp 5.24%
Galaxy Digital Inc 4.86%
Cipher Digital Inc 4.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BTCC and LFGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BTCCLFGYBTCCLFGYBTCCLFGY
3 months+12.8%−0.3%10.4%10.6%−16.4 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+4.3%+25.6%20.2%26.4%−11.4 pts−8.2 pts
1 year−32.5%−1.5%29.0%40.1%−1.4 pts−13.6 pts
Since launch−17.7%+9.5%53.5%62.4%−10.8 pts−42.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTCC and LFGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTCC
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
LFGY
YieldMax(R) Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on BITQ, paying weekly
IssuerGrayscaleYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized20.2%39.4%
Expense ratio0.65%1.02%
Cash paid, 1 year29.0%40.1%
Price change, 1 year−59.1%−44.7%
Total return, 1 year−32.5%−1.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%+12.1%
Ahead or behind−1.4 pts−13.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published63%
Age534 days612 days
Net assets$17m$110m

BTCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCC paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 59.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −32.5%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid monthly.

LFGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LFGY paid 40.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 63% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BTCC or LFGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCC paid 29.0% of its starting price in cash and LFGY paid 40.1%, so LFGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BTCC or LFGY?
With every distribution reinvested, BTCC returned −32.5% and LFGY returned −1.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LFGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, BTCC or LFGY?
BTCC charges 0.65% a year and LFGY charges 1.02%, so BTCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTCC against LFGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTCC against LFGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/btcc-vs-lfgy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources