Data as of .
BLOX vs BTCC: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year BTCC paid 29.0% of its price in cash against BLOX’s 26.3%, though BLOX returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BTCC scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BLOX and BTCC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BLOX | Only in BTCC |
|---|---|
| VanEck Bitcoin ETF/US 11.39% | TREASURY BILL 100.00% |
| TSMC 9.01% | |
| Hut 8 Corp 8.56% | |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 8.47% | |
| Galaxy Digital Inc 7.71% | |
| IREN Ltd 7.36% | |
| Cipher Digital Inc 7.14% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 6.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOX | BTCC | BLOX | BTCC | BLOX | BTCC | |
| 3 months | −8.9% | +12.8% | 7.9% | 10.4% | −6.8 pts | −16.4 pts |
| 6 months | +21.8% | +4.3% | 19.0% | 20.2% | −12.0 pts | −11.4 pts |
| 1 year | −14.5% | −32.5% | 26.3% | 29.0% | −26.6 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Since launch | +17.1% | −17.7% | 42.0% | 53.5% | −37.3 pts | −10.8 pts |
| BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF Option income on BITQ, paying weekly | BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nicholas | Grayscale |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy | Bitcoin (IBIT) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 32.7% | 20.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.3% | 29.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | −40.9% | −59.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | −14.5% | −32.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +12.1% | −31.1% |
| Ahead or behind | −26.6 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 458 days | 534 days |
| Net assets | $268m | $17m |
BLOX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BLOX paid 26.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 40.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 26.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.7%, paid weekly.
BTCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCC paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 59.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −32.5%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BLOX or BTCC?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BLOX paid 26.3% of its starting price in cash and BTCC paid 29.0%, so BTCC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BLOX or BTCC?
- With every distribution reinvested, BLOX returned −14.5% and BTCC returned −32.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BLOX returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BLOX or BTCC?
- BLOX charges 0.99% a year and BTCC charges 0.65%, so BTCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BLOX against BTCC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/blox-vs-btcc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.