Data as of .
BCCC vs XRPM: which paid, and which earned it?
BCCC and XRPM both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and XRPM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BCCC | Only in XRPM |
|---|---|
| CASH 60.21% | XRPC 12/18/2026 11.25 C 27.22% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49% | Canary XRP ETF 26.37% |
| VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15% | Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 23.01% |
| 4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19% | United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 8.34% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60% | United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 8.32% |
| 4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06% | Cash & Other 6.98% |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/19/2026 6.24% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCC | XRPM | BCCC | XRPM | BCCC | XRPM | |
| 3 months | +19.2% | −3.8% | 7.7% | 8.3% | −10.0 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +9.2% | −21.4% | 14.4% | 14.4% | −6.6 pts | −55.3 pts |
| 1 year | −25.1% | not published | 24.2% | not published | +5.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −15.4% | −48.5% | 35.2% | 15.6% | +7.4 pts | −76.3 pts |
| BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly | XRPM Amplify XRP 3 Monthly Premium Income ETF Covered call on BITQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.1% | 37.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.2% | 15.6% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −48.5% | −60.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.1% | −48.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | +27.9% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.9 pts | −76.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 471 days | 304 days |
| Net assets | $9m | $12m |
BCCC in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XRPM in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, XRPM paid 15.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 60.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −48.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +27.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 76.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against XRPM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-xrpm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.