Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTCI vs YBIT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year YBIT paid 31.3% of its price in cash against BTCI’s 18.6% and the two finished level on total return.

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF.

18.6%BTCI cash paid, 1 year
31.3%YBIT cash paid, 1 year
−29.1%BTCI total return, 1 year
−28.7%YBIT total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BTCI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BTCI 45.3YBIT 44.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTCI2 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBIT
YBIT2.3 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%YBIT−28.7%2.3 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%YBIT−28.7%2.3 pts ahead of IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BTCI and YBIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BTCIOnly in YBIT
United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 58.93%TREASURY BILL 36.73%
CBTX US 10/16/26 C1390 22.94%TREASURY BILL 32.22%
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 17.31%TREASURY BILL 31.05%
VanEck Bitcoin ETF/US 2.01%
CBTX US 10/16/26 P1390 -0.18%
CBTX US 10/16/26 C2060 -0.37%
CBTX US 10/16/26 C1980 -0.63%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BTCI and YBIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BTCIYBITBTCIYBITBTCIYBIT
3 months+22.3%+23.6%7.0%13.3%−6.9 pts−5.7 pts
6 months+11.9%+10.8%12.7%23.1%−3.8 pts−4.9 pts
1 year−29.1%−28.7%18.6%31.3%+2.0 pts+2.3 pts
Since launch+15.5%−10.5%54.4%74.2%−5.5 pts−31.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTCI and YBIT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
Option income on IBIT, paying monthly
YBIT
YieldMax(R) Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
IssuerNEOSYieldMax
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized26.3%68.0%
Expense ratio0.99%1.02%
Cash paid, 1 year18.6%31.3%
Price change, 1 year−47.0%−58.9%
Total return, 1 year−29.1%−28.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%−31.1%
Ahead or behind+2.0 pts+2.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%0%
Age701 days878 days
Net assets$1.3bn$61m

BTCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YBIT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YBIT paid 31.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 58.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −28.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 68.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BTCI or YBIT?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting price in cash and YBIT paid 31.3%, so YBIT paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BTCI or YBIT?
With every distribution reinvested, BTCI returned −29.1% and YBIT returned −28.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YBIT returned more.
Which is cheaper, BTCI or YBIT?
BTCI charges 0.99% a year and YBIT charges 1.02%, so BTCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTCI against YBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTCI against YBIT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/btci-vs-ybit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources