Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BCCC vs BITY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year BCCC paid 24.2% of its price in cash against BITY’s 15.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF.

24.2%BCCC cash paid, 1 year
15.1%BITY cash paid, 1 year
−25.1%BCCC total return, 1 year
−37.8%BITY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BCCC 50.9BITY 21.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BCCC5.9 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBIT
BITY6.7 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BITY−37.8%6.7 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BITY−37.8%6.7 pts behind IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and BITY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BCCCOnly in BITY
CASH 60.21%Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 38.47%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49%iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 25.12%
VANECK BITCOIN ETF 10.15%Cash & Other 16.45%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19%MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 C 12.94%
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60%United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 10.90%
4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06%United States Treasury Bill 09/29/2026 0.44%
MBTX 09/22/2026 188.42 C -1.93%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 P -2.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BCCC and BITY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BCCCBITYBCCCBITYBCCCBITY
3 months+19.2%+15.7%7.7%6.0%−10.0 pts−13.5 pts
6 months+9.2%+2.6%14.4%11.4%−6.6 pts−13.1 pts
1 year−25.1%−37.8%24.2%15.1%+5.9 pts−6.7 pts
Since launch−15.4%−20.9%35.2%26.9%+7.4 pts−5.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BCCC and BITY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
BITY
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF
Option income on IBIT, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XAmplify
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized29.1%23.8%
Expense ratio0.75%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year24.2%15.1%
Price change, 1 year−48.5%−51.5%
Total return, 1 year−25.1%−37.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%−31.1%
Ahead or behind+5.9 pts−6.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age471 days507 days
Net assets$9m$14m

BCCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

BITY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BITY paid 15.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 51.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −37.8%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BCCC or BITY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and BITY paid 15.1%, so BCCC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or BITY?
With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and BITY returned −37.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BCCC returned more.
Which is cheaper, BCCC or BITY?
BCCC charges 0.75% a year and BITY charges 0.65%, so BITY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BCCC against BITY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against BITY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-bity Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources