Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BCCC vs BLOX: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year BLOX paid 26.3% of its price in cash against BCCC’s 24.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF.

24.2%BCCC cash paid, 1 year
26.3%BLOX cash paid, 1 year
−25.1%BCCC total return, 1 year
−14.5%BLOX total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BCCC scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BCCC 50.9BLOX 5.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BCCC5.9 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BCCC−25.1%5.9 pts ahead of IBIT
BLOX26.6 pts behind BITQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BITQ+12.1%BLOX−14.5%26.6 pts behind BITQTotal return, distributions reinvestedBITQ+12.1%BLOX−14.5%26.6 pts behind BITQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCCC and BLOX hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BCCC and BLOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBCCCBLOX
VANECK BITCOIN ETF10.15%11.39%
Only in each
Only in BCCCOnly in BLOX
CASH 60.21%TSMC 9.01%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 C30 31.49%Hut 8 Corp 8.56%
4IBIT 10/30/2026 P30 -0.19%iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 8.47%
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.60%Galaxy Digital Inc 7.71%
4IBIT 09/25/2026 C46.02 -1.06%IREN Ltd 7.36%
Cipher Digital Inc 7.14%
NVIDIA Corp 6.62%
Robinhood Markets Inc 5.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BCCC and BLOX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BCCCBLOXBCCCBLOXBCCCBLOX
3 months+19.2%−8.9%7.7%7.9%−10.0 pts−6.8 pts
6 months+9.2%+21.8%14.4%19.0%−6.6 pts−12.0 pts
1 year−25.1%−14.5%24.2%26.3%+5.9 pts−26.6 pts
Since launch−15.4%+17.1%35.2%42.0%+7.4 pts−37.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BCCC and BLOX on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
Option income on BITQ, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XNicholas
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized29.1%32.7%
Expense ratio0.75%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year24.2%26.3%
Price change, 1 year−48.5%−40.9%
Total return, 1 year−25.1%−14.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%+12.1%
Ahead or behind+5.9 pts−26.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age471 days458 days
Net assets$9m$268m

BCCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 48.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.1%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

BLOX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BLOX paid 26.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 40.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 26.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.7%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BCCC or BLOX?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BCCC paid 24.2% of its starting price in cash and BLOX paid 26.3%, so BLOX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BCCC or BLOX?
With every distribution reinvested, BCCC returned −25.1% and BLOX returned −14.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BLOX returned more.
Which is cheaper, BCCC or BLOX?
BCCC charges 0.75% a year and BLOX charges 0.99%, so BCCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BCCC against BLOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCCC against BLOX, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bccc-vs-blox Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources