Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs TLA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACYB costs 0.43 points a year less; TLA is 1.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | TLA |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 0.4% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 4% of the Jun 5, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 19.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $7.3m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.19 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 12.5%, price −0.4%, total +13.2%, TSLA −5.8%, +19.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
TSLA
−5.8%
TLA
+13.2%
12.5% of it arrived as cash
19 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
19 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 12.5%, price −0.4%, total +13.2%, TSLA −5.8%, +19.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
TSLA
−5.8%
TLA
+13.2%
12.5% cash
19 pts ahead of TSLA
12.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TLA since launch: paid 12.5%, price −0.4%, total +13.2%, TSLA −5.8%, +19.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | TLA | ACYB | TLA | ACYB | TLA |
| 3 months | – | +8.1% | – | 3.2% | – | −8.8 pts |
| 6 months | – | +7.9% | – | 7.7% | – | +18.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · TLA Feb 2026 | −0.6% | +13.2% | 0.0% | 12.5% | not measured | +19.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
TLA
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, TLA paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −5.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 19.0 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.0%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against TLA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-tla
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against TLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-tla
[ACYB against TLA (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-tla)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and TLA both write options for income.
ACYB and TLA
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, TLA +0.2%: TLA +1.3 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.