Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs IACL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
IACL costs 0.20 points a year less; ACYB is 3.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | IACL |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | rose 0.2% (since Aug 18, 2026) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $1.3m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IACL
+1.8%
1.6% of it arrived as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IACL
+1.8%
1.6% cash
1.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | IACL | ACYB | IACL | ACYB | IACL |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · IACL Aug 2026 | −0.6% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 1.6% | not measured | not measured |
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
IACL
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 18, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, IACL paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.8%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against IACL, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-iacl
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-iacl
[ACYB against IACL (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-iacl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and IACL both write options for income.
ACYB and IACL
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, IACL +0.4%: IACL +1.5 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.