Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs SCA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACYB costs 0.43 points a year less; ACYB is 1.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | SCA |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 13.8% (since May 27, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Super Micro (SMCI) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $3.8m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.30.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SMCI
−29.3%
SCA
+1.6%
30.9 pts ahead of SMCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
30.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SMCI
−29.3%
SCA
+1.6%
30.9 pts ahead of SMCI
15.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −13.8%, total +1.6%, SMCI −29.3%, +30.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | SCA | ACYB | SCA | ACYB | SCA |
| 3 months | – | −7.1% | – | 6.3% | – | +24.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · SCA May 2026 | −0.6% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 15.9% | not measured | +30.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
SCA
Over the period from its first trade on May 27, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, SCA paid 15.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −29.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 30.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 43.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 29% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against SCA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-sca
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against SCA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-sca
[ACYB against SCA (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-sca)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and SCA both write options for income.
ACYB and SCA
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, SCA −14.5%: ACYB +13.4 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.