Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

SCA vs SMYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

SCA and SMYY both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCA and SMYY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $3.8m for GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF and $5.3m for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF.

At a glance
15.9%
SCA cash paid, since launch, May 27, 2026
50.5%
SMYY cash paid, 1 year
+8.6%
SCA total return, since launch, May 27, 2026
−30.7%
SMYY total return, 1 year
SCA · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 31.1 pts ahead of SMCI
SCA
+8.6%
SMCI
−22.5%

31.1 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −7.9%, total +8.6%, SMCI −22.5%, +31.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SMCI

−22.5%

SCA

+8.6%

15.9% as cash

31.1 pts ahead of SMCI

Total return, distributions reinvested

31.1 pts ahead of SMCI

SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −7.9%, total +8.6%, SMCI −22.5%, +31.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SMCI

−22.5%

SCA

+8.6%

31.1 pts ahead of SMCI

15.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SCA since launch: paid 15.9%, price −7.9%, total +8.6%, SMCI −22.5%, +31.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SMYY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 6.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SMYY
−30.7%
SMCI
−37.6%

6.9 pts ahead of SMCI

SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SMCI

−37.6%

SMYY

−30.7%

6.9 pts ahead of SMCI

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.9 pts ahead of SMCI

SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SMCI

−37.6%

SMYY

−30.7%

6.9 pts ahead of SMCI

50.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 1.18% a year; SMYY is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SCA vs SMYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureSCASMYY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published−30.7%
Price changefell 7.9% (since May 27, 2026)fell 76.0% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate29% of the Sep 11, 2026 payment97% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkSuper Micro (SMCI)Super Micro (SMCI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.18%1.18%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$3.8m$5.3m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Side by side

SCA GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF · Autocallable on SMCI, paying monthly SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF · Synthetic covered call on SMCI, paying weekly
Strategy autocallable synthetic covered call
Benchmark Super Micro (SMCI) Super Micro (SMCI)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 40.3% 77.0%
Expense ratio 1.18% 1.18%
Cash paid, 1 year 15.9% (since launch, May 27, 2026) 50.5%
Price change, 1 year −7.9% (since launch, May 27, 2026) −76.0%
Total return, 1 year +8.6% (since launch, May 27, 2026) −30.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year −22.5% (since launch, May 27, 2026) −37.6%
Ahead or behind +31.1 pts (since launch, May 27, 2026) +6.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 29% 97%
Age 161 days 1.1 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $3.8m $5.3m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: SCA vs SMYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowSCASMYYSCASMYYSCASMYY
3 months+17.6%+1.9%11.0%17.6%+20.0 pts+4.3 pts
6 months–−10.3%–32.0%–+4.3 pts
1 year–−30.7%–50.5%–+6.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: SCA May 2026 · SMYY Sep 2025+8.6%−31.0%15.9%57.0%+31.1 pts+7.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCA

Over the period from its first trade on May 27, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, SCA paid 15.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.6%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −22.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 31.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 40.3%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 29% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SMYY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMYY paid 50.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 76.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −30.7%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −37.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 6.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 77.0%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, SCA or SMYY?
SCA and SMYY both charge 1.18% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCA against SMYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sca-vs-smyy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.