Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SCA vs SMCY: which paid, and which earned it?

SCA and SMCY both write options for income.

GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF and YieldMax(R) SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF.

12.8%SCA cash paid, 1 year
46.8%SMCY cash paid, 1 year
+14.7%SCA total return, 1 year
−18.9%SMCY total return, 1 year
SCA12.3 pts ahead of SMCI · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SMCI+2.4%SCA+14.7%12.8% of it arrived as cash12.3 pts ahead of SMCITotal return, distributions reinvestedSMCI+2.4%SCA+14.7%12.3 pts ahead of SMCI
SMCY3.9 pts behind SMCI · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SMCI−14.9%SMCY−18.9%3.9 pts behind SMCITotal return, distributions reinvestedSMCI−14.9%SMCY−18.9%3.9 pts behind SMCI

Performance, window by window

SCA and SMCY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
SCASMCYSCASMCYSCASMCY
3 months+25.4%+24.8%10.8%19.9%−2.1 pts−2.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+61.7%not published47.8%not published−28.7 pts
1 yearnot published−18.9%not published46.8%not published−3.9 pts
Since launch+14.7%−32.4%12.8%63.9%+12.3 pts−20.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SCA and SMCY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCA
GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF
Option income on SMCI, paying monthly
SMCY
YieldMax(R) SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SMCI, paying weekly
IssuerGraniteSharesYieldMax
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkSuper Micro (SMCI)Super Micro (SMCI)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized37.6%65.6%
Expense ratio1.07%1.01%
Cash paid, 1 year12.8% (since launch on May 27, 2026)46.8%
Price change, 1 year+0.2%−66.5%
Total return, 1 year+14.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)−18.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+2.4%−14.9%
Ahead or behind+12.3 pts−3.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published97%
Age114 days736 days
Net assets$2m$143m

SCA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, SCA paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned +2.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.6%, paid monthly.

SMCY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SMCY paid 46.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 66.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −18.9%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −14.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 65.6%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, SCA or SMCY?
SCA charges 1.07% a year and SMCY charges 1.01%, so SMCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCA against SMCY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCA against SMCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sca-vs-smcy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources