Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SMCY vs SMYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMYY paid 50.5% of its price in cash against SMCY’s 40.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SMCY and SMYY
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $112m for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF and $5.3m for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF.
About even with SMCI
SMCY over 1 year: paid 40.2%, price −72.7%, total −37.9%, SMCI −37.6%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SMCI
−37.6%
SMCY
−37.9%
about even with SMCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SMCI
SMCY over 1 year: paid 40.2%, price −72.7%, total −37.9%, SMCI −37.6%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SMCI
−37.6%
SMCY
−37.9%
about even with SMCI
40.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SMCY over 1 year: paid 40.2%, price −72.7%, total −37.9%, SMCI −37.6%, −0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.6.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SMCI
−37.6%
SMYY
−30.7%
6.9 pts ahead of SMCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
6.9 pts ahead of SMCI
SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SMCI
−37.6%
SMYY
−30.7%
6.9 pts ahead of SMCI
50.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SMYY over 1 year: paid 50.5%, price −76.0%, total −30.7%, SMCI −37.6%, +6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SMCY costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.2 points; SMCY is far larger, $112m against $5.3m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SMCY | SMYY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −37.9% | −30.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 72.7% | fell 76.0% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 95% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 97% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Super Micro (SMCI) | Super Micro (SMCI) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $112m | $5.3m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 77 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Oct 10, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 55 weekly returns · each against SMCIFrom Oct 2025 to Oct 2026, SMYY returned more: −32.5% to −36.9%. SMYY swung less: 26.7% to 77.0%. SMYY fell less at its worst: −36.2% to −53.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SMCY | SMYY | SMCI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | −36.9% | −32.5% | SMYY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | −35.3% | −31.1% | SMYY | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | −74.5% | −78.5% | SMCY (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 77.0% | 26.7% | SMYY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 57.7% | 23.1% | SMYY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −53.8% | −36.2% | SMYY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 39.5% | 2.4% | 100.0% | SMCY | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 99.1% | 84.0% | 100.0% | SMYY | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.22 | 1.00 | SMYY lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.98 | 0.55 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | −0.21 | −1.40 | SMCY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | −0.29 | −1.61 | SMCY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | −0.199 | −1.728 | −0.059 | SMCY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | −0.66 | −0.86 | SMCY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SMCI | SMCI | SMCI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −11.6% a year | −36.0% a year | 0.0% | SMYY significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.07 | −2.06 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −33.2% to +10.1% | −71.1% to −1.0% | SMCY's includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.55 | −0.42 | SMYY | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 19.3% | 74.3% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 55 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SMCY and SMYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SMCY | SMYY | SMCY | SMYY | SMCY | SMYY |
| 3 months | −2.7% | +1.9% | 21.2% | 17.6% | −0.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
| 6 months | −18.1% | −10.3% | 32.3% | 32.0% | −3.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
| 1 year | −37.9% | −30.7% | 40.2% | 50.5% | −0.4 pts | +6.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: SMCY Sep 2024 · SMYY Sep 2025 | −47.8% | −31.0% | 64.7% | 57.0% | −14.8 pts | +7.2 pts |
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 127 days apart.
SMCY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMCY paid 40.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 72.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −37.9%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −37.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 69.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
SMYY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SMYY paid 50.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 76.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −30.7%. Super Micro (SMCI) returned −37.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 6.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 77.0%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SMCY against SMYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/smcy-vs-smyy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SMCY against SMYY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/smcy-vs-smyy
[SMCY against SMYY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/smcy-vs-smyy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.