Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs MRA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACYB costs 0.43 points a year less; ACYB is 1.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | MRA |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 41.6% (since May 27, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | MARA (MARA) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $2.2m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.20.7 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MARA
−49.8%
MRA
−29.1%
20.7 pts ahead of MARA
Total return, distributions reinvested
20.7 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MARA
−49.8%
MRA
−29.1%
20.7 pts ahead of MARA
17.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MRA since launch: paid 17.0%, price −41.6%, total −29.1%, MARA −49.8%, +20.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | MRA | ACYB | MRA | ACYB | MRA |
| 3 months | – | −14.8% | – | 9.1% | – | +7.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · MRA May 2026 | −0.6% | −29.1% | 0.0% | 17.0% | not measured | +20.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
MRA
Over the period from its first trade on May 27, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MRA paid 17.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. MARA (MARA) returned −49.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 20.7 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 68.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against MRA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-mra
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against MRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-mra
[ACYB against MRA (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-mra)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and MRA both write options for income.
ACYB and MRA
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, MRA −24.7%: ACYB +23.6 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.