CRSH vs TLA: which paid, and which earned it?
CRSH and TLA both write options for income. YieldMax(R) Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF.
38 pts ahead of TSLA
CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
CRSH
+17.8%
50.4% of it arrived as cash
38 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
38 pts ahead of TSLA
CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
CRSH
+17.8%
38 pts ahead of TSLA
50.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
11.1% as cash
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
11.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +17.8%. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CRSH | TLA | CRSH | TLA | CRSH | TLA |
| 3 months | +15.3% | +3.3% | 15.0% | 3.1% | +31.9 pts | +19.9 pts |
| 6 months | −1.7% | +11.2% | 23.0% | 8.2% | +5.2 pts | +18.1 pts |
| 1 year | +17.8% | not published | 50.4% | not published | +38.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch CRSH May 2024 · TLA Feb 2026 | −52.1% | +10.4% | 51.6% | 11.1% | −149.2 pts | +26.3 pts |
CRSH and TLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CRSH and TLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CRSH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CRSH paid 50.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −20.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 38.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 43.6%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
TLA in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CRSH against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tla
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CRSH against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tla Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CRSH against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tla
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CRSH against TLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tla
- Markdown
- [CRSH against TLA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tla)