Which paid more, CRSH or TSLP?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CRSH paid 50.4% of its starting price in cash and TSLP paid 20.2%, so CRSH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, CRSH or TSLP?

With every distribution reinvested, CRSH returned +17.8% and TSLP −24.2% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, CRSH or TSLP?

CRSH charges 1.05% a year and TSLP charges 0.99%, so TSLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

CRSH vs TSLP: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year CRSH paid 50.4% of its price in cash against TSLP’s 20.2%, and returned more with it reinvested. YieldMax(R) Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla (TSLA) ETF.

50.4%

CRSH cash paid, 1 year

20.2%

TSLP cash paid, 1 year

+17.8%

CRSH total return, 1 year

−24.2%

TSLP total return, 1 year

CRSH · 1 year to Sep 30, 202638 pts ahead of TSLA

CRSH

+17.8%

TSLA

−20.2%

38 pts ahead of TSLA

CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.

TSLA

−20.2%

CRSH

+17.8%

50.4% of it arrived as cash

38 pts ahead of TSLA

Total return, distributions reinvested

38 pts ahead of TSLA

CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.

TSLA

−20.2%

CRSH

+17.8%

38 pts ahead of TSLA

50.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CRSH over 1 year: paid 50.4%, price −36.5%, total +17.8%, TSLA −20.2%, +38.0 pts.

TSLP · 1 year to Sep 30, 20264 pts behind TSLA

TSLP

−24.2%

TSLA

−20.2%

4 pts behind TSLA

TSLP over 1 year: paid 20.2%, price −41.0%, total −24.2%, TSLA −20.2%, −4.0 pts.

TSLA

−20.2%

TSLP

−24.2%

4 pts behind TSLA

Total return, distributions reinvested

4 pts behind TSLA

TSLP over 1 year: paid 20.2%, price −41.0%, total −24.2%, TSLA −20.2%, −4.0 pts.

TSLA

−20.2%

TSLP

−24.2%

4 pts behind TSLA

20.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +17.8%. TSLP over 1 year: paid 20.2%, price −41.0%, total −24.2%, TSLA −20.2%, −4.0 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · CRSH scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

CRSH 78.5

TSLP 56.5

7.2, the lowest in this set97.2, the highest

A percentile among the 70 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CRSH and TSLP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CRSH TSLP

Only in CRSH

United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 42.50%

United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 18.13%

United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.55%

First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 10.98%

United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 10.55%

TSLA 11/20/2026 370.02 P 8.43%

TSLA US 10/02/26 P360 0.81%

TSLA US 10/02/26 P352.5 0.75%

Only in TSLP

TREASURY BILL 45.34%

TREASURY BILL 28.86%

TREASURY BILL 25.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	CRSH	TSLP	CRSH	TSLP	CRSH	TSLP
3 months	+15.3%	−19.7%	15.0%	5.0%	+31.9 pts	−3.1 pts
6 months	−1.7%	−12.4%	23.0%	11.0%	+5.2 pts	−5.5 pts
1 year	+17.8%	−24.2%	50.4%	20.2%	+38.0 pts	−4.0 pts
Since launch CRSH May 2024 · TSLP Oct 2023	−52.1%	+33.5%	51.6%	75.0%	−149.2 pts	−37.6 pts

CRSH and TSLP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CRSH

YieldMax(R) Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF · Short single-stock option income on TSLA, paying weekly

TSLP

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla (TSLA) ETF · Synthetic covered call on TSLA, paying monthly

Issuer YieldMax Kurv

Strategy short single-stock option income synthetic covered call

Benchmark Tesla (TSLA) Tesla (TSLA)

Pays weekly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 43.6% 26.5%

Expense ratio 1.05% 0.99%

Cash paid, 1 year 50.4% 20.2%

Price change, 1 year −36.5% −41.0%

Total return, 1 year +17.8% −24.2%

Benchmark return, 1 year −20.2% −20.2%

Ahead or behind +38.0 pts −4.0 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 0% 90%

Age 881 days 1069 days

Net assets $15m $17m

CRSH and TSLP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CRSH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CRSH paid 50.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −20.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 38.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 43.6%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TSLP in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, TSLP paid 20.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −24.2%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −20.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 90% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CRSH or TSLP?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CRSH paid 50.4% of its starting price in cash and TSLP paid 20.2%, so CRSH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CRSH or TSLP?: With every distribution reinvested, CRSH returned +17.8% and TSLP −24.2% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, CRSH or TSLP?: CRSH charges 1.05% a year and TSLP charges 0.99%, so TSLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CRSH vs TSII CRSH vs TSLW CRSH vs TSLY CRSH vs TSYY TSLP vs TSLW TSLP vs TSYY TSLP vs TYYY TSLP vs XVTS

CRSH on its own →TSLP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CRSH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CRSH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗CRSH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗YieldMax page for CRSH ↗TSLP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TSLP 19a-1 distribution notice ↗Kurv page for TSLP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CRSH against TSLP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/crsh-vs-tslp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.