Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs ANV: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACYB costs 0.43 points a year less; ANV is 2.0 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | ANV |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 7.3% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | NVIDIA (NVDA) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $8.1m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
NVDA
−7.6%
ANV
+3.0%
10.7% as cash
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
NVDA
−7.6%
ANV
+3.0%
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | ANV | ACYB | ANV | ACYB | ANV |
| 3 months | – | −7.5% | – | 2.3% | – | +18.6 pts |
| 6 months | – | −4.0% | – | 6.3% | – | +25.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | −0.6% | +3.0% | 0.0% | 10.7% | not measured | +10.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
ANV
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ANV paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned −7.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 10.6 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against ANV, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-anv
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-anv
[ACYB against ANV (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-anv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and ANV both write options for income.
ACYB and ANV
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, ANV −9.0%: ACYB +7.9 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.