Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB vs PLA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACYB costs 0.43 points a year less; PLA is 1.7 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACYB | PLA |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 0.1% (since May 19, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Palantir (PLTR) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $4.0m | $6.9m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.18.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
PLTR
+26.9%
PLA
+8.7%
8.6% of it arrived as cash
18.2 pts behind PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
18.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
PLTR
+26.9%
PLA
+8.7%
18.2 pts behind PLTR
8.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYB | PLA | ACYB | PLA | ACYB | PLA |
| 3 months | – | −0.1% | – | 3.2% | – | +4.1 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACYB Oct 2026 · PLA May 2026 | −0.6% | +8.7% | 0.0% | 8.6% | not measured | −18.2 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
PLA
Over the period from its first trade on May 19, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, PLA paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACYB against PLA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-pla
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACYB against PLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-pla
[ACYB against PLA (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyb-vs-pla)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACYB and PLA both write options for income.
ACYB and PLA
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACYB −1.1%, PLA −2.2%: ACYB +1.1 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.