ACRT vs ACYQ: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ACYQ both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
3.7 pts ahead of SPY
ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.
SPY
+4.3%
ACYQ
+8.0%
3.7 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.7 pts ahead of SPY
ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.
SPY
+4.3%
ACYQ
+8.0%
3.7 pts ahead of SPY
1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.0%. ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ACYQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ACYQ | ACRT | ACYQ | ACRT | ACYQ |
| 3 months | not published | +6.0% | not published | 1.8% | not published | +3.5 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ACYQ Jun 2026 | −8.7% | +8.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.0 pts | +3.7 pts |
ACRT and ACYQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and ACYQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ACYQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jun 24, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYQ paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +4.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyq
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyq
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against ACYQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyq
- Markdown
- [ACRT against ACYQ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyq)