Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACRT vs ACYB: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
ACRT costs 0.03 points a year less; ACYB is 2.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACRT | ACYB |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 12.8% (since Aug 14, 2026) | fell 0.6% (since Oct 7, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $1.4m | $4.0m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
0.9 pts behind IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IWM
−8.5%
ACRT
−9.4%
0.9 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.9 pts behind IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IWM
−8.5%
ACRT
−9.4%
0.9 pts behind IWM
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ACYB
−0.6%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. ACYB since launch: paid 0.0%, price −0.6%, total −0.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ACYB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 11, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ACYB | ACRT | ACYB | ACRT | ACYB |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACRT Aug 2026 · ACYB Oct 2026 | −9.4% | −0.6% | 3.4% | 0.0% | −0.9 pts | not measured |
ACRT
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACRT paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.4%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.8%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
ACYB
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACYB paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACRT against ACYB, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyb
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACRT against ACYB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyb
[ACRT against ACYB (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acyb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACRT and ACYB both write options for income.
ACRT and ACYB
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACRT +0.7%, ACYB −1.1%: ACRT +1.8 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.