Which is cheaper, ACRT or MRA?

ACRT charges 0.72% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACRT vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACRT and MRA both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

0.0%

ACRT cash paid, since launch

13.7%

MRA cash paid, since launch

−8.7%

ACRT total return, since launch

+4.6%

MRA total return, since launch

ACRT · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with IWM

ACRT

−8.7%

IWM

−8.7%

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA

+4.6%

MARA

−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

13.7% as cash

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +4.6%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACRT	MRA	ACRT	MRA	ACRT	MRA
3 months	not published	+7.2%	not published	7.5%	not published	+22.4 pts
Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · MRA May 2026	−8.7%	+4.6%	0.0%	13.7%	0.0 pts	+25.5 pts

ACRT and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACRT

ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM

MRA

GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly

Issuer ProShares GraniteShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) MARA (MARA)

Pays not established monthly

Payout rate, annualized not published 45.3%

Expense ratio 0.72% 1.07%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −8.7% −10.4%

Total return, 1 year −8.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year −8.7% −20.9%

Ahead or behind 0.0 pts +25.5 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 47 days 126 days

Net assets $1m $1m

ACRT and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACRT in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACRT or MRA?: ACRT charges 0.72% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACRT vs CAIE ACRT vs CAIQ ACRT vs DACL ACRT vs FTKI MRA vs MAAY MRA vs MARO MRA vs MSR MRA vs OCTH

Russell 2000 (IWM) →ACRT on its own →MRA on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACRT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACRT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for ACRT ↗MRA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MRA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for MRA ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACRT against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.