ACRT vs DACL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and DACL both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
2.2 pts ahead of SPY
DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.
SPY
−1.7%
DACL
+0.5%
2.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.2 pts ahead of SPY
DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.
SPY
−1.7%
DACL
+0.5%
2.2 pts ahead of SPY
0.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +0.5%. DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | DACL | ACRT | DACL | ACRT | DACL |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · DACL Aug 2026 | −8.7% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0 pts | +2.2 pts |
ACRT and DACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and DACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
DACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 13, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, DACL paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −1.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against DACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-dacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against DACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-dacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against DACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-dacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against DACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-dacl
- Markdown
- [ACRT against DACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-dacl)