Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ACRT vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
MPDY costs 0.02 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACRT | MPDY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 12.8% (since Aug 14, 2026) | fell 11.2% (since Aug 12, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.70% |
| Net assets | $1.4m | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
0.9 pts behind IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IWM
−8.5%
ACRT
−9.4%
0.9 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.9 pts behind IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IWM
−8.5%
ACRT
−9.4%
0.9 pts behind IWM
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −12.8%, total −9.4%, IWM −8.5%, −0.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPDY
−9.1%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPDY
−9.1%
2.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | MPDY | ACRT | MPDY | ACRT | MPDY |
| 3 months | – | −10.3% | – | 2.3% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACRT Aug 2026 · MPDY Aug 2026 | −9.4% | −9.1% | 3.4% | 2.3% | −0.9 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACRT
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACRT paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.4%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.8%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MPDY
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPDY paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.1%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACRT against MPDY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-mpdy
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ACRT against MPDY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-mpdy
[ACRT against MPDY (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-mpdy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ACRT and MPDY both write options for income.
ACRT and MPDY
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
ACRT +0.7%, MPDY −8.4%: ACRT +9.1 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.