ACRT vs ATCL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and ATCL both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and REX Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7.9% as cash
7 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7 pts behind SPY
7.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +12.0%. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ATCL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | ATCL | ACRT | ATCL | ACRT | ATCL |
| 3 months | not published | +1.4% | not published | 3.4% | not published | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +7.5% | not published | 7.0% | not published | −9.5 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ATCL Feb 2026 | −8.7% | +5.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 0.0 pts | −7.0 pts |
ACRT and ATCL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and ATCL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ATCL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-atcl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-atcl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-atcl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against ATCL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-atcl
- Markdown
- [ACRT against ATCL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-atcl)