Data as of .
ACRT vs OVS: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and OVS both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and OVS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACRT | Only in OVS |
|---|---|
| RU2K LADDERED AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 100.00% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRT | OVS | ACRT | OVS | ACRT | OVS | |
| 3 months | not published | −2.7% | not published | 2.6% | not published | +0.9 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +16.8% | not published | 5.9% | not published | −1.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +18.9% | not published | 9.8% | not published | +1.7 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +57.0% | not published | 20.3% | not published | −5.5 pts |
| Since launch | −6.7% | +113.2% | 0.0% | 39.6% | −0.1 pts | +4.5 pts |
| ACRT ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on IWM | OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay on IWM, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | option income | put-selling overlay |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 (IWM) | Russell 2000 (IWM) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 11.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 9.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.7% | +8.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +18.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −6.6% | +17.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.1 pts | +1.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 2544 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $28m |
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −6.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
OVS in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVS paid 9.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +17.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.0%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against OVS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-ovs Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.