Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OVS vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVS paid 11.3% of its price in cash against RYLG’s 10.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OVS and RYLG

Net assets: $39m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF, and $7.7m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

At a glance
11.3%
OVS cash paid, 1 year
10.7%
RYLG cash paid, 1 year
+26.4%
OVS total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RYLG total return, 1 year
OVS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.2 pts ahead of IJR
OVS
+26.4%
IJR
+24.2%

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IJR

+24.2%

OVS

+26.4%

11.3% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IJR

+24.2%

OVS

+26.4%

2.2 pts ahead of IJR

11.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OVS over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price +14.4%, total +26.4%, IJR +24.2%, +2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3 pts behind IWM
RYLG
+16.0%
IWM
+19.0%

3 pts behind IWM

RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLG

+16.0%

10.7% of it arrived as cash

3 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

3 pts behind IWM

RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLG

+16.0%

3 pts behind IWM

10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.4%. RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.4%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RYLG costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OVS vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOVSRYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+16.0%
Price change, 1 yearrose 14.4%rose 4.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, measured through IJRRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 2.2 ptsbehind by 3.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.83%0.35%
Net assets, OVS as of Aug 31, 2026 and RYLG as of Oct 12, 2026$39m$7.7m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OVS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score90.7OVS78.7RYLG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, OVS and RYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OVS RYLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OVS
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 100.03%
Only in RYLG
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OVS Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF · Put-selling overlay on IJR, paying monthly RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy put-selling overlay covered call
Benchmark iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 10.3% 5.7%
Expense ratio 0.83% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 11.3% 10.7%
Price change, 1 year +14.4% +4.4%
Total return, 1 year +26.4% +16.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year +24.2% +19.0%
Ahead or behind +2.2 pts −3.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 7.1 years 4.1 years
Net assets, OVS as of Aug 31, 2026 and RYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 $39m $7.7m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OVS vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOVSRYLGOVSRYLGOVSRYLG
3 months−4.1%−3.8%2.5%1.4%−0.4 pts+1.2 pts
6 months+2.9%+2.0%5.2%3.4%−0.6 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+26.4%+16.0%11.3%10.7%+2.2 pts−3.0 pts
3 years+67.1%+50.0%22.8%40.2%+8.2 pts−18.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: OVS Oct 2019 · RYLG Oct 2022+118.6%+46.2%42.4%44.5%+9.8 pts−24.6 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OVS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVS paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) returned +24.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.3%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLG paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OVS or RYLG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVS paid 11.3% of its starting price in cash and RYLG paid 10.7%, so OVS paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVS or RYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, OVS returned +26.4% and RYLG +16.0% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OVS or RYLG?
OVS charges 0.83% a year and RYLG charges 0.35%, so RYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OVS against RYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovs-vs-rylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.