Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACRT vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACRT and RYLG both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACRT and RYLG
Net assets: $1.5m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF, and $7.7m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.3 pts behind IWM
RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLG
+16.0%
10.7% of it arrived as cash
3 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
3 pts behind IWM
RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
RYLG
+16.0%
3 pts behind IWM
10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
RYLG costs 0.37 points a year less; RYLG is 5.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACRT | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +16.0% |
| Price change | fell 10.7% (since Aug 14, 2026) | rose 4.4% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 3.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $1.4m | $7.7m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and RYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | RYLG | ACRT | RYLG | ACRT | RYLG |
| 3 months | – | −3.8% | – | 1.4% | – | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | – | +2.0% | – | 3.4% | – | +2.5 pts |
| 1 year | – | +16.0% | – | 10.7% | – | −3.0 pts |
| 3 years | – | +50.0% | – | 40.2% | – | −18.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACRT Aug 2026 · RYLG Oct 2022 | −7.2% | +46.2% | 3.4% | 44.5% | −0.6 pts | −24.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACRT
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACRT paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.2%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −6.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.4%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
RYLG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLG paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACRT against RYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-rylg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACRT against RYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-rylg
[ACRT against RYLG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-rylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.