Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

IWMY vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMY paid 28.6% of its price in cash against RYLG’s 10.7%, though RYLG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWMY and RYLG

Net assets: $79m on Nov 3, 2026 for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF, and $7.7m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

At a glance
28.6%
IWMY cash paid, 1 year
10.7%
RYLG cash paid, 1 year
+7.9%
IWMY total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RYLG total return, 1 year
IWMY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 11.1 pts behind IWM
IWMY
+7.9%
IWM
+19.0%

11.1 pts behind IWM

IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMY

+7.9%

28.6% of it arrived as cash

11.1 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

11.1 pts behind IWM

IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

IWMY

+7.9%

11.1 pts behind IWM

28.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3 pts behind IWM
RYLG
+16.0%
IWM
+19.0%

3 pts behind IWM

RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLG

+16.0%

10.7% of it arrived as cash

3 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

3 pts behind IWM

RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RYLG

+16.0%

10.7% cash

3 pts behind IWM

10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLG over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +16.0%, IWM +19.0%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RYLG costs 0.70 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; IWMY is 10.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IWMY vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureIWMYRYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+16.0%
Price change, 1 yearfell 21.4%rose 4.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.05%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$83m$7.7m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RYLG scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score25.4IWMY78.7RYLG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWMY and RYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWMY RYLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWMY
Rut 12/18/2026 200.34 C 99.12%
Rut 11/05/2026 2866.09 C 0.25%
Rut 11/05/2026 2856.95 C -0.38%
Only in RYLG
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF · Option income on IWM, paying weekly RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 29.9% 5.7%
Expense ratio 1.05% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 28.6% 10.7%
Price change, 1 year −21.4% +4.4%
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +16.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind −11.1 pts −3.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 3.0 years 4.1 years
Net assets, IWMY as of Nov 3, 2026 and RYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 $79m $7.7m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: IWMY vs RYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowIWMYRYLGIWMYRYLGIWMYRYLG
3 months−6.1%−3.8%7.0%1.4%−1.1 pts+1.2 pts
6 months−2.3%+2.0%14.0%3.4%−1.8 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+7.9%+16.0%28.6%10.7%−11.0 pts−3.0 pts
3 years+36.8%+50.0%90.4%40.2%−31.5 pts−18.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: IWMY Oct 2023 · RYLG Oct 2022+40.4%+46.2%92.7%44.5%−38.1 pts−24.6 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWMY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMY paid 28.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.9%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RYLG paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IWMY or RYLG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMY paid 28.6% of its starting price in cash and RYLG paid 10.7%, so IWMY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IWMY or RYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, IWMY returned +7.9% and RYLG +16.0% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, IWMY or RYLG?
IWMY charges 1.05% a year and RYLG charges 0.35%, so RYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWMY against RYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iwmy-vs-rylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.