Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACRT vs IWMY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACRT and IWMY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACRT and IWMY
Net assets: $1.5m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF, and $79m on Nov 3, 2026 for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.11.1 pts behind IWM
IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMY
+7.9%
28.6% as cash
11.1 pts behind IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.1 pts behind IWM
IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMY
+7.9%
11.1 pts behind IWM
28.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. IWMY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −21.4%, total +7.9%, IWM +19.0%, −11.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
ACRT costs 0.33 points a year less; IWMY is far larger, $79m against $1.4m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACRT | IWMY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +7.9% |
| Price change | fell 10.7% (since Aug 14, 2026) | fell 21.4% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 1.05% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.4m | $79m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and IWMY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | IWMY | ACRT | IWMY | ACRT | IWMY |
| 3 months | – | −6.1% | – | 7.0% | – | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | – | −2.3% | – | 14.0% | – | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | +7.9% | – | 28.6% | – | −11.0 pts |
| 3 years | – | +36.8% | – | 90.4% | – | −31.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACRT Aug 2026 · IWMY Oct 2023 | −7.2% | +40.4% | 3.4% | 92.7% | −0.6 pts | −38.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACRT
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACRT paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.2%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −6.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.4%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
IWMY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMY paid 28.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.9%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACRT against IWMY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACRT against IWMY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmy
[ACRT against IWMY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.